Legal Opinion

Washburn v. Court Ordered Benefits Section

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 11, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2021-1281Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHOO WASHBURN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1281 (TJK) U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAG- MENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff sued the Office of Personnel Management, seeking to redirect federal-retirement- benefit payments linked to her ex-husband’s federal service that it is paying to her court-appointed guardian. But Congress has vested the exclusive power to decide such issues in other adjudicative bodies. So the Court must dismiss most of her claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. To the extent the Court has…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API