Legal Opinion

Stone v. Stone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1923No. Appeal, No. 211PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This is a bill to establish a trust relation with respect to $11,500 transferred to appellant’s wife.

Complaint is made that the court below did not answer complainant’s requests for findings of fact as required by Rule 62: Glenn v. J. C. Trees Oil Co., 266 Pa. 74, 81. There may have been a technical violation of this rule. We do not so hold in view of the amendment of June 27, 1919, which empowers the judge to state findings of fact “in his own language.” And all requests of the parties “not so adopted and embodied shall be either affirmed, refused, or modified,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glenn v. TreesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Achenbach v. StoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Glenn v. J. C. Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Leh v. DuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Donsavage EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. White v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Sneiderman v. KahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API