Gregory v. Schoenell
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
Replevin by Frederick Schoenell, against James G-. Gregory, to recover the possession of a pair of mules, one set of double harness and one wagon, which, it is alleged, were the property of Schoenell, and were wrongfully taken and unlawfully detained by Gregory.
Demurrer to complaint overruled. Exceptions. Answer. Trial by jury. Yerdict for Schoenell. Motion for a new trial overruled. Exceptions. Judgment The causes assigned for a new trial are:
“1st. Misconduct of th§ prevailing party ;
“2d. That the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and is contrary to law;
*103“ ?d. Error of law at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stewart v. RitterskampIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by17 opinions
- Higham v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Watson Coal & Mining Co. v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Wiley ex rel. Scobey v. BarclayIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Cameron v. MountWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Darby & Co. v. KroellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.