Legal Opinion

Bonds v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1997No. 96-1193PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Danny Bonds, an inmate, filed suit pro se and in forma pauperis against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The trial court dismissed the suit as frivolous, as authorized by section 13.001 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Bonds filed a motion containing information about his trust account, but he did not file the certified statement required by section 14.006(f) of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The trial court did not request the information but simply ordered Bonds to pay the total court fees and costs. The court of appeals affirmed. — S.W.2d-.

Section 14.006(a) states…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Hearn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  2. Thomas v. Knight, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  3. Hughes v. Massey, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  4. In Re Carson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  5. Dan Thomas v. Linda Bilby-Knight and Mettie Faye Degetaire, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API