Carter v. State

OPINION ON REMAND

On appeal to this court, Carter argued that he should not have been sentenced as an habitual felony offender, because the predicate convictions had been entered at the same time. We reversed and certified the issue to the Supreme Court. Carter v. State, 588 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). In State v. Carter, 595 So.2d 955 (Fla.1992), the Supreme Court quashed our decision, and remanded to this court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Barnes, 595 So.2d 22 (Fla.1992).

Along with his argument based on the absence of sequential convictions, Carter also argued for…