Legal Opinion

Pizzolato v. Perez

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 4, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-3601PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARCENEAUX, District Judge.

This action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(2), 1985(3) and 1986, came on for trial on March 26, 1981. The parties submitted post-trial memoranda. Having considered these materials, the testimony and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The pending state prosecution of plaintiff be permanently enjoined; and,

2. Compensatory damages in the amount of $10,000.00 and punitive damages in the amount of $10,000.00 are owing to plaintiff from defendants Petrovich and Jurjevich, for those violations of plaintiff’s constitutional rights, all as more…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardy W. Ryland and Alma Odessa Ryland v. Alfred B. Shapiro, Edwin O. Ware and Edward E. Roberts, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Hall v. LillyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Phelps v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API