Legal Opinion
Pasciutti v. LiquidPiston, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 30, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01243Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOSEPH PASCIUTTI, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Case No. 3:20-cv-01243 (RNC) : LIQUIDPISTON, INC. and : ALEXANDER SHKOLNIK, : : Defendants. : RULING AND ORDER Plaintiff Joseph Pasciutti brings this action against his former employer, LiquidPiston, Inc. (“LPI”), and its chief executive officer, Alexander Shkolnik. The first three counts of the nine-count complaint seek to recover benefits allegedly due under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The remaining counts seek damages for alleged violations of state law.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pasternack v. ShraderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Hahn v. National Westminster Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Kaelin v. Tenneco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Hardy v. Adam Rose Retirement PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.