Legal Opinion

Ameral v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided December 3, 1996No. TC 3970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

Plaintiff (taxpayer) appeals the disqualification of his land from special farm use assessment for the 1995-96 tax year. Taxpayer claims that he leased the property during the spring of 1994 for the pasturing of horses. The Department of Revenue (department) contends that no horses were pastured on taxpayer’s property that year. The department further contends that, even if taxpayer did lease the property, the horses were pleasure horses and did not qualify as farm use.

FACTS

In 1988, taxpayer purchased the subject property, which is 197.7 acres zoned exclusive farm use…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beddoe v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1979
  2. Capsey v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF OREGONOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Taylor v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maitra v. Douglas County Assessor, Tc-Md 101052b (or.tax 4-1-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
  2. Young v. Jackson County AssessorOregon Tax Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API