Legal Opinion
Graubart v. Posner
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 20, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover for the loss of a Persian coat and skins originally shipped by plaintiff Graubart Bros., a limited partnership, to defendant Posner’s, doing business in Philadelphia. The goods were sent on consignment and, after being rejected by Posner’s, were delivered to the Bailway Express Agency for return to Graubart, in New York. Title to the property remained in plaintiff under the agreement. The defendant declared the skins as worth $50 when it returned the merchandise. Graubart Bros, was not insured. The goods were lost in transit. The net loss was $1,124.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. . HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Newman v. Clayton F. Summy Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Northern Assurance Co. v. WolkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
- Rhind v. StakeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Northern Assurance Co. v. WolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kassvan v. Thomas E. McElroy Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- B. Ordover & Sons, Inc. v. KayMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Ikegwuoha v. Art Village GalleryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023