Legal Opinion

KIM

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1968No. 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1907 MATTER OF KIM In Visa Petition Proceedings A-17238448 Decided by Regional Commissioner October 4, 1968 NvtAvithstanding beneficiary is a qualified pharmacist and, fence, a member of the professions within the meaning of section 101(a) (32) of the Immi- gration and Nationality Act, as amended, he is ineligible for preference status under section 203(a) (3) of the Act since he is not presently en- gaged, nor does he intend to engage, in the profession of pharmacist. ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: John F. Sheffield, Esquire 412 West Sixth Street Los Angeles, California 90014…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. SHINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  2. SEMERJIANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  3. RABBANIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yui Sing Tse and Debbie Siu-Mai Tse v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. SHAHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
  3. Yui Sing Tse and Debbie Siu-Mai Tse v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API