Hill v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
On motion of defendants in this case, at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence, a verdict in favor of the defendants was instructed by the trial court, a verdict was returned according to such instruction, and a judgment rendered thereon in favor of the defendants, to which plaintiffs’ sued out this writ of error.
It is well settled that a party moving for a directed verdict admits, not only the facts shown by the evi dence, but also every reasonable inference favorable to the adverse party that the jury might fairly and reasonably arrive at from the evidence. And if there is evidence which is…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Katz v. BearSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- McAllister v. Miami Daily NewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Arnold v. StewartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Blair Contracting Co. v. William E. Arnold Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973