Legal Opinion

Bock v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1926No. A-5611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

Oin information charging that in Kiowa county, on the 11th day of December, 1924, T. F. Bock did then and there unlawfully and intentionally operate and use a distillery for the purpose of manufacturing distilled spirits, to. wit, whisky, he was convicted and, in accordance with the verdict of the jury sentenced to serve 90 days in jail and pay a fine of $400. From the judgment he appeals.

A number of errors are assigned and argued, but one of which it is deemed necessary to notice, and that is that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence.

T. P.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Rutherford v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Pierson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Knight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Breedlove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API