Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Matheson v. Miami-Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 27, 2015No. 14-0405Published

1ConcurrenceEmas, J.

I concur in affirming the final judgment below, and write to further explain my reasons.

Although our standard of review is de novo, such review is tempered by the “strong public policy against courts interfering in the democratic processes of elections.” Let Miami Beach Decide v. City of *231Miami Beach, 120 So.3d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (quoting Fla. League of Cities v. Smith, 607 So.2d 397, 400 (Fla.1992)). Therefore, “[a] court may declare a proposed ... amendment invalid only if the record shows that the proposal is clearly and conclusively defective.” O’Connell v. Martin Cnty., 84 So.3d 463,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Askew v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Armstrong v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Florida League of Cities v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Let Miami Beach Decide v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. O'CONNELL v. Martin CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API