Legal Opinion
Stupak-Thrall v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 23, 1996No. 94-1863PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The en banc court is equally divided in this case. Seven members favor affirmance of the judgment of the District Court, and seven favor reversal. Hence, as is customary under such circumstances, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed by an equally divided vote.
The mandate will not issue for fourteen (14) days from the date of this order so that members of the court may file any separate opinions they wish to.*
This Order was originally filed on June 24, 1996, and is now being reissued for full-text publication with a separate concurring opinion by Judge MOORE (pp. 1269-1272), in…
2Cited by34 opinions
- School District of City of Pontiac v. Secretary of US Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 79 v. Rick ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Anthony D. Barber, United States of America v. David L. Hodge, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.