Legal Opinion

Bank of Boston Connecticut v. Degroff

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 11, 1993No. 11427PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The plaintiff appeals following the trial court’s denial of its motion to modify a judgment rendered pursuant to a stipulation agreement. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly reduced the amount of attorney’s fees set forth in the stipulation in granting the motion for judgment. We agree with the plaintiff, and reverse the trial court’s order denying the plaintiff’s motion to modify the judgment.

On December 10, 1991, the plaintiff initiated a collection action against the defendants, William DeGroff and Harrold DeGroff. The plaintiff alleged a debt in the amount of $11,828.78,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Bryan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Lee v. TufvesonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. Foley v. Southport Manor Convalescent Center, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dougan v. DouganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Cupe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Przekopski v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Churchill v. AllessioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Midland Funding, LLC v. TrippConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API