Legal Opinion

People v. Blatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Isidor Blatt and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, rendered on the 27th day of November, 1908, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings upon the verdict of a jury convicting the- defendants of the crimes of burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the first degree, and also from an order denying their motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

The defendants were convicted of the crimes of burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the first degree in that on the 26th day of May, 1906, with intent to commit a crime, they broke into the factory building of Frederick Seifter and took therefrom a quantity of furs exceeding in value the sum of $500. The principal witness called by the People to connect defendants with the *718crime was Simon Sablinsky. Without his testimony a conviction would-have been .impossible. He testified that the robbery was planned at his father’s house a night or two before it was actually…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Remsen v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. People v. . BonierNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. People v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. People v. RiggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. People v. SodanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API