Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1930No. Docket No. 7256PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTON, J., pro tem.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition directed to the Superior Court in and for the county of Los Angeles, commanding said court to refrain from further proceedings in an action therein commenced on the ground that the issues involved in such action are referable to arbitration.

The plaintiff in the suit in question entered into an agreement bearing date May 2, 1929, wherein it conveyed to three trustees all its assets for the purpose of converting them into cash and liquidating its indebtedness. The contract provided that when the indebtedness of the debtor and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Young v. Crescent Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pacific Investment Co. v. TownsendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Hise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. W. A. Rose Co. v. Municipal Court for Oakland-Piedmont Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. B. L. Metcalf General Contractor, Inc. v. Earl Erne, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API