Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Owen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1951No. 17357PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

To the petition of the administrator for interpleader to require named persons who claimed to be heirs to set up their claims, and for the court to adjudicate the lawful heirs, all defendants, except the husband of the deceased intestate, filed an answer which contained an allegation that the husband had been convicted of the murder of the deceased and is now serving a life sentence therefor. To this allegation Mayo, the husband, filed a demurrer upon the grounds that it was irrelevant and prejudicial. The court order thereon recites that “after hearing argument . .…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City Council v. LombardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Ford v. FargasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Ford v. FargasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Roberts v. BurnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Howard L. Carmichael & Sons Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. FloydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  3. Oxford v. ShumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Mayo v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Hatcher v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API