Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Seher v. Woodlawn School District No. 26
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1953No. File 7336Published
1ConcurrenceChristianson, J.
I concur in an affirmance of the judgment. The defendant is a common school district, and the laws of this state provide that the school board of such di strict :
“Shall employ the teachers of the district and may dismiss a teacher at any time for plain violation of contract, gross Immorality, or flagrant neglect of duty. ... No person shall be permitted to teach in any public school who is not the holder of a teacher’s certificate or a permit to teach, valid in the county or district in which the school is situated. Every contract for the employment of a teacher shall be in writing, . . .”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Ransom v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- School Dist. No. 94, Grant Co. v. GautierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Goose River Bank v. Willow Lake School TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Mootz v. BelyeaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.