Legal Opinion

Kathleen Simpson v. Cir

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2016No. 14-72372UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Kathleen Simpson settled an employment suit and received a large payout. Only a small portion of the settlement was included as income when she and her husband jointly filed their taxes the following year. The Internal Revenue Service issued a notice of deficiency, and the case proceeded to trial before the Tax Court. The Tax Court held that all but 10% of the settlement proceeds had to be included as income. The Simpsons moved for attorney fees. The Tax Court denied fees. The Simpsons timely appeal.

We review a decision of the Tax Court the same way we review any decision…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clair S. Huffman v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Raischell & Cottrell, Inc. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Commissioner v. DunkinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daniel R. Doyle & Lynn A. Doyle v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
  2. Donald L. Zinger & Nicole A. Zinger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
  3. Dorothea E. Beckett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2020
  4. John A. Voigt & Lorinda C. Martin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
  5. Jon K. Palsgaard & Kimberly A. Kelly v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API