Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. Schumacher
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 2000No. 20000155Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 12/7/00 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2000 ND 204
Pamela Mayo, now known
as Pamela Banjac, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
William M. Mayo, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20000032
Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard W. Grosz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Opinion of the Court by Neumann, Justice.
Mark A. Meyer of Meyer Law firm, P.O. Box 216, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-
0216, for plaintiff and appellant.
Robert J. Schultz of Conmy, Feste, Hubbard, Corwin & Brust, Ltd., P.O. Box 2686, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2686, for defendant and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Ludwig v. BurchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Holtz v. HoltzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.