Legal Opinion

Buford v. Laborers International Union Local 269

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 14, 2019No. 1:16-cv-10218Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MAURICE BUFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) 16 C 10218 ) vs. ) Judge Gary Feinerman ) LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 269 ) and LABORERS’ LOCAL UNION NO. 4, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Maurice Buford brings this pro se suit against his union, Laborers’ International Union Local 269, and its alleged successor, Laborers’ Local Union No. 4, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging that Local 269 discriminated against him on the basis of…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Henry Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API