Legal Opinion

Brouwer, Receiver, &c. of The Pelican Mut. Insurance v. Harbeck

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided June 19, 1852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts of this case are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Bosworth, J.

On the 12th of Nov., 1847, the Pelican Mutual Insurance Company borrowed of 0. & Gr. Belden $2,500. No time was fixed by the terms of the loan when the money was to be repaid. The company gave a memorandum check for the sum borrowed, signed by their president, payable to the order of and endorsed by their secretary, and at the same time delivered to the Beldens as collateral security for the return of the money three promissory notes belonging to the company, and being part of their property and effects.

*122On the 6th of December the defendants loaned to the company $1,000, and on the 7th of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gillett v. CampbellCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Curtis, Graham & Blatchford v. LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Talman v. FranklinThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854
  3. Scott v. JohnsonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1859
  4. Brouwer v. HarbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API