Legal Opinion

C. Earl Brown, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1989No. Appeal 123 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Narick,

The two petitioners before this Court, Tornetta GMC Truck & Equipment Co. and Triangle GMC Truck, Inc. (Petitioners) were dealers whose heavy-duty truck franchises weré terminated by General Motors Corporation (GMC). Petitioners each filed separate appeals with the State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons (Board), which consolidated five separate appeals for hearing. Petitioners contended that GMC had ille gaily terminated their franchises under Section 9(c) of the Board of Vehicles Act (Act), Act of December 22, 1983, P.L. 306, as amended,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loos & Dilworth v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Pritz A., Inc. v. St. Bd. of Vehicle Md & S.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schott Motorcycle Supply, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Coblentz GMC/Freightliner v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1989
  3. Rohrich Cadillac, Inc. v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. AIS Construction Equipment Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API