Bombard v. Department of Labor
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Dissent
Johnson, J.,
¶ 16. dissenting. The majority’s overly technical and narrow view of an employee’s obligation to inform his employer of problems in the workplace *533results in an unfair denial of benefits to claimant. The undisputed facts demonstrate that claimant suffered through intolerable working conditions at two of employer’s stores and notified employer of these conditions on several occasions. By pretending that employer solved the first abusive situation and thus ignoring that history, the majority unreasonably concludes that claimant was required to make further efforts to resolve the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Eulo v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEAL COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Langlois v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Rushlow v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Chapman v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.