Legal Opinion

State v. Woolsey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Fayette District Oowrt. The defendant was jointly indicted with John Lightfoot for the larceny of two horses. Yerdict'of guilty. Motion for new trial overruled. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The record presents a single question, to wit: Does the evidence warrant the verdict ? The testimony establishing the circumstances of the offense is quite brief. It shows that the horses were stolen from the!pasture of the owner, on the night of Monday the 23d of May, 1870. On the Thursday following, Sheehan, Deputy U. S. Mar*244shal for Minnesota, saw Lightfoot, in company with another, about three and one-half miles west of Albert Lea, Freeborn Co., Minnesota, driving the stolen horses to a buggy. The defendant, Woolsey, accompanied them, riding a pony, and leading a brown mustang pony. They…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. State v. SalingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. State v. WiseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API