Legal Opinion

McRae v. Garth Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Delta. (Stone, J.) Eeplevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Action of replevin. Plaintiff had .verdict and judgment in the court below, finding the title in him to •■such property as was taken on the writ, and a money judgment of $1,427.49 for property described in the writ, •and not found hy the officer.

*490The claim of the plaintiff on the trial was that he cut and delivered into the White Fish river, in the winter of 1892-93, 10,655 white pine logs, and 765 pieces of waney timber, and that such logs and timber were driven down the river by defendant, and put into its boom; that thereafter plaintiff received from the defendant, before commencement of…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maynard v. KeeneMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. TiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Stevenson v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Tobin v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Wilbur v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API