Legal Opinion

Salas-Triana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 1996No. 95-0282Published

1Per curiam

On the first issue raised by appellant, pursuant to our decision, in State v. Haddix, 668 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we answer the following certified question, as modified, in the negative, and affirm the trial court.

WHETHER THE STATE MUST ALLEGE PRIOR DUI CONVICTIONS IN THE CHARGING DOCUMENT BEFORE A DEFENDANT, CHARGED AND CONVICTED OF MISDEMEANOR DUI, CAN RECEIVE AN ENHANCED MISDEMEANOR DUI PENALTY UNDER SECTION 316.193(2)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES.

As for the second issue, we also find no error and affirm. The amendment to the information during trial was permissible. See State v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. State v. HaddixDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API