Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Wylie
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouck, J.
The errors complained of in this case were the result of a suit for damages commenced in the common pleas court by Chalmers C. Wylie against William H. Arnold. The petition of the plaintiff in its first cause of action alleged:
“That on or about the 25th day of August, 1925, and again on or about the 28th day of August, 1925, the defendant, Arnold, wickedly and unjustly, debauched and criminally knew one Maggie E. Wylie, then and still being the wife of the pi aim tiff; that, as the result of the aforesaid debauchery and criminal association with this plaintiff’s wife, a child was born to the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Swartz v. SteeleOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Jasterbowski v. MichosOhio Court of Appeals · 1975