Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Rosenfeld

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Craig

This was a bill, filed by Rosenfeld and Rosenberg, to foreclose a deed of trust executed by Samuel J. Walker to J. G. Rogers on certain lots in Chicago, to secure a note for $25,000, which was held as collateral security for a note of $7000, bearing date April 23, 1873, due in ninety days, and numbered 2729. Jenkins, assignee of Walker, and Biddle, a subsequent purchaser of the premises, were defendants in the bill. These defendants filed cross-bills to redeem, and for an account. The circuit court found the amount due on the $7000 note, and also on the note held as collateral security, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Iglehart v. WessonIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Hadden v. InnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Carter v. MosesIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Tompkins v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Trust & Credit Co. v. F. H. Orcutt & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
  2. Carter v. FarthingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Wheeler v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API