Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 25, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00216Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON RAMON BOYCE, Petitioner, : Case No. 3:21-cv-216 - vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz TIM SHOOP, Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, : Respondent. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO AMEND THE JUDGMENT This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by Petitioner Ramon Boyce under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e)(ECF No. 101). As a post-judgment motion, it is referred to the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API