Legal Opinion
Smith & Smith v. Bowsmith, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 1992No. 91-16137Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
976 F.2d 737
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
SMITH & SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BOWSMITH, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-16137.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 18, 1992.
Decided Sept. 17, 1992.
Before WIGGINS, O'SCANNLAIN and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM*
2
This appeal arises out of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Bowsmith,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,935 Vance L. Ragsdale v. John Frederick Haller AKA Fred HallerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Karen Sue Morris v. State of California Ventura County Municipal Court Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Sams v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.