Legal Opinion

Rasing v. Department of the Navy

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 7, 2006No. 2005-3053Published

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-3053 ROMEO M. RASING, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent. Charles E. Moore, Simpson & Brenner, LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for petitioner. David D. D’Alessandris, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and William F. Ryan, Assistant Director. Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board United States…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John F. Roberto v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Howard D. Cowan v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Mary Rose Diefenderfer v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Michael Carley v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Jerry C. Sturdy v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API