Sigitas Brinklys v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs Sigitas Brinklys and Aurelija Caruso (“Aurelija”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants following the denial of Brinklys’s 1-130 petition seeking an immigrant visa on behalf of his spouse, Aure-lija. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (“CIS”) denied the petition after concluding that Aurelija had previously entered into a fraudulent marriage for the purpose of evading immigration laws. On appeal, Plaintiffs argue that (1) the CIS violated its own regulations and Brinklys’s due process rights by providing insufficient…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LAUREANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
- Ramsis Ghaly, Dr. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Warshauer v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- PHILLISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arenas v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
- Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Sarasota, LLC v. BecerraDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
- Misseme v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Parcha v. CuccinelliDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
- Singh v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021