Legal Opinion

Lamb v. . R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action is by an employee engaged in interstate commerce, and on duty at the time of the occurrence, to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of defendant company, chiefly in the sudden, unusual, violent, and negligent stopping of a freight train by defendant company or its agents and employees whereby plaintiff received serious and painful physical injury from which he still suffers, etc.

There was denial of liability on the part of defendant — pleas of contributory negligence, assumption of risk — evidence offered by the parties to sustain their respective…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. . BlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Bass v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Candler v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API