Commonwealth v. Baumgartner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY MURRAY, J.:
*13 Charles Baumgartner (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed after a jury convicted him of animal fighting for amusement or gain. 1 Appellant claims the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. After careful review, we affirm.
Appellant was charged as a result of an incident that occurred on March 9, 2017. The criminal complaint states:
[Appellant] did bring his white pit bull or bully dog named Menace to the area of 14th and Swatara Streets to fight a pit bull dog belonging to Adam Aviles. [Appellant] did slap his dog several times and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ClarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. Giulian v. Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. HoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Com. v. Dunkins, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Munson, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Dunkins, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Bennett, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Canganelli, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.