Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Pearson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. See Merritt v. Pearson, 58 Ind. 385. The issues have not been changed, and need not be re-stated. The action was to enforce a mechanic’s lien. The questions now presented for decision are predicated on the overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial. There is ah effort, however, to present questions which can not properly be made the subject of this motion.

It is claimed that the verdict is silent in reference to the right of the appellee to enforce his alleged lien; that it is *45simply a money verdict, for a sum which the jury found to be due…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. StephensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Kissell v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Merritt v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mann v. SchnarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kendall Lumber & Coal Co. v. RomanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Barton v. McWhinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. NiblackIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API