Legal Opinion
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Kendo Holdings Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 5, 2024No. 3:22-cv-08958Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 AMARTE USA HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 22-cv-08958-CRB 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 10 v. MOTION FOR FEES 11 KENDO HOLDINGS INC., et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiff Amarte USA sued Defendants Kendo, Marc Jacobs International, Sephora 14 USA, and the Neiman Marcus Group for trademark infringement. See Compl. (dkt. 1). 15 The Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See MSJ Order (dkt. 173). 16 Defendants now move for attorney fees. See Mot. (dkt. 190). The Court finds the matter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Sunearth, Inc. v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. QuattrocchiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Stone Basket Innovations, LLC v. Cook Medical LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Gregory Caputo v. Tungsten Heavy Powder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.