Legal Opinion
Thourot v. Hartnett
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 8, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
56 N.J. Super. 306 (1959)
152 A.2d 858
HARRY J. THOUROT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BERNARD M. HARTNETT AND MURRAY GREIMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 8, 1959.
Decided July 8, 1959.
Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.
Mr. Isadore Glauberman argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss on the brief).
Mr. Joseph A. Davis argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. O'Mara, Schuman, Davis & Lynch, attorneys; Mr. John M. Walsh on the brief).
2Per curiam
In this action Thourot sues Hartnett, and Greiman his attorney, for libel,…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Fenning v. SG Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- O'Regan v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
- Rogers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- LaPorta v. LeonardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Devlin v. GreinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Wendy's of So. Jersey, Inc. v. Blanchard Manage. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- DeVivo v. AscherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Genito v. RabinowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Williams v. KenneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.