Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Henley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2010No. 2008AP697-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 87. (concurring). Understanding the procedural background of this case is vital to understanding its importance.

*584PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 88. Dimitri Henley was one of three defendants charged with the sexual assault of a young student at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater in 1998. His first trial in 1999 ended in a mistrial. His second trial in 2000 ended in a conviction of five counts of second-degree sexual assault.

¶ 89. Henley's postconviction counsel was different from his trial counsel, and his postconviction counsel argued to the circuit court that Henley's trial counsel had provided…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. DearbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. LoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API