Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Trost
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the plaintiff’s present contentions, the Supreme Court, Putnam County, properly dismissed the complaint pursuant to the Statute of Frauds (see, General Obligations Law § 5-703 [2]), as the letters and other documents submitted by the plaintiff failed to set forth all of the essential and material terms for a valid agreement among the parties for the conveyance of interests in real property (see, Tetz v Dexter, 133 AD2d 79; Tamir v Greenberg, 119 AD2d 665, lv denied 68 NY2d 607; Villano v G & C Homes, 46 AD2d 907, appeal dismissed 36 NY2d 918, lv dismissed 40 NY2d 959). Moreover,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. La VanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Villano v. G & C Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Jonestown Place Corp. v. 153 West 33rd Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Tamir v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Korff v. Pica Graphics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Four Star Capital Corp. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997