Legal Opinion · Dissent

London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. Courtney

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1939No. 1814Published

1DissentBratton, Circuit Judge

I agree that the case was removable. My inability to join with the majority is .. , ... . , . , limited to the question of dismissal without . ... ^ P i '

Section 620, Oklahoma Statutes 1931, 12 Okl.St.Ann. § 1177, provides that the answer of the garnishee shall become com-elusive of the facts stated therein rcspecting liability to the defendant unless plaintiff shall within twenty days serve upon the garnishee notice in writing that he elects to controvert such answer. The statute is plain, and it is settled law in Oklahoma that the facts stated in the answer in respect of liability of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Davis v. LillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. Mason v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API