Legal Opinion

Champagne v. Champagne

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 27, 1999No. AC 17829PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPALLONE, J.

The plaintiff, Marla Champagne, appeals from the postdissolution judgment of the trial court holding that the investment strategy of the current trustee was prudent under the very “conflicted circumstances” in which the trustee was operating. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly determined the amount of appreciation that the education trust would have realized had it been invested prudently since the date the separation agreement was executed, and improperly concluded that the “conflicting circumstances” should have any bearing on the reasonableness or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BladesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Richard v. A. Waldman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Champagne v. ChampagneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Carissa K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API