Legal Opinion

Bristol v. Mazza

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1956No. 15695PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.

The executors of the estate of Clotilda Bicocchi Jenkins, deceased, brought suit for construction of certain provisions of her will. Only the construction of paragraph XII is before us for review.

Paragraph XII reads as follows:

“After having made provision for the foregoing bequests and devises, then the rest and residue of my estate in whatever property it may consist shall pass to and become vested in my surviving first cousins hereinafter specified — that is to say, the first cousin who shall survive my death. Said cousins who are now living and from whom the class of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lockett v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. In Re the Estate of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Combs v. CombsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. McDow v. LundCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Walker v. ChambersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sammons v. Elder, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  2. Barnstable v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Binger v. AckermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Jensen v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Welch v. Trustees of the Robert A. Welch FoundationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API