Legal Opinion
Armijo v. Welmaker
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 16, 1973No. Civ. 71-699 PHXPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge.
This is a negligence action involving parties of diverse citizenship. It is here on defendant’s motion to dismiss by reason of the running of the statute of limitations.
Pertinent facts taken from the complaint, record, and supplemental affidavits of the parties are these. Plaintiffs are residents of the State of Arizona and Defendant Nolan Welmaker is a resident of the State of California. On December 30, 1969 near Kent, Texas, the automobile which defendant was driving collided with the automobile in which plaintiffs were riding. On December 30, 1971,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Murphey v. ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Elizabethtown Trust Company v. KonschakDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Taylor v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Parry Navigation Co., Inc. The Paul David JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ingram v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Ingram v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Dillingham v. Greeley Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Watson v. E.W. Bliss Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Odence v. VenturesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.