Legal Opinion

Long v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1972No. 6501PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REILLY, Chief Judge.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is the quantum of proof which must be presented by the prosecution to sustain a conviction for forging or uttering a forged document in violation of D.C.Code 1967, § 22-1401. Appellant was tried on an indictment charging him under this section of the Code with three counts of forgery and three of uttering, found guilty by a jury on all counts, and sentenced to a term of one to three years imprisonment on each — the sentences to run concurrently.

The theory of the Government’s case was that appellant had fraudulently used a credit card…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hymes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Payton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API