Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Morrison

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 17, 1996No. 94-6663PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we hold that dual motivation analysis 1 determines whether a prosecutor violates a defendant’s equal protection rights under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), when the prosecutor considers both race and race-neutral factors in exercising a peremptory strike.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, David L. Wallace challenges his conviction in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Aabama, for attempted murder and robbery. He is currently serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Wallace asserts that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Robert Allen Gattis v. Robert Snyder, Warden, Delaware Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. TokarsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Payton v. KearseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Cook v. LaMarqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Loleta Allen-BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API