Legal Opinion

Salemo v. Salemo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1989No. 00892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the Decree of Divorce. Appellee initially filed a complaint in divorce under 23 P.S. § 201(c). Appellant filed an answer and counterclaim under 23 P.S. § 201(a)(2). Thereafter, appellee filed an amended complaint alleging that appellant had been sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a period of two or more years and thus, requesting a divorce pursuant to 23 P.S. § 201(a)(5). Appellant filed an answer to the amended complaint alleging that his sentence was not final as it was currently on appeal. In August, 1987, appellee filed a petition for bifurcation. A hearing on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bernard C. Jerry v. Anthony Mastro Francisco, Warden Parker Bronson, Jerry Lavelle and Robert AppleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Com. of Pa. Ex Rel. Fraley v. Rotan, Dist. Atty.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. In Re Marriage of AllisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Vanaman v. CowgillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Restifo v. RestifoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. S.T. v. R.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Sullivan v. ShawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. In Re: Order Amending Rule 1930.4 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. In Re: Order Amending Rules 1910.11, 1910.12, 1915.4-2, 1915.4-3, 1920.51, 1930.4 and 1930.8 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. In Re: Order Amending Rules 1930.2, 1930.4 and 1930.5 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API