Legal Opinion
In re Richard C.
New York City Family Court
Decided August 4, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stanley Gartenstein, J.
We hold herein that there exists no statutory or constitutional right to a hearing in favor of the recipient of an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. (ACD) prior to vacatur thereof and restoration of the underlying cause for trial or disposition.
the facts:
After the respondent herein was found to have committed an act which if committed by an adult would constitute a crime under section 165.25 of the Penal Law (jostling) the matter was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal on consent for a six-month period to expire on July 7, 1982. During…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hassan v. Magistrates' CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. WingardNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- McDonald v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Charles M.New York City Family Court · 1987
- In re HandNew York City Family Court · 1985