Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mancuso v. United Bank of Pueblo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 7, 1991No. 90SC142Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Justice ERICKSON,

specially concurring in part and dissenting in part:

The district court granted summary judgment and the court of appeals affirmed. Mancuso v. United Bank, 796 P.2d 7 (Colo.App.1990). We granted certio-rari to determine three issues. First, whether the funds in Grace Mancuso’s joint savings account and certificates of deposit were special deposits and, thus, were insulated from United Bank’s right of setoff under section 11-6-105, 4B C.R.S. (1990 Supp.). Second, whether the bank had a duty to exercise reasonable care in rendering advice to Mancuso and, if so, whether it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Jefferson County School District R-1 v. Justus ex rel. JustusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Simmons v. JenkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Deist v. WachholzMontana Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API